State V. Delaney

Memorandum Date:         2/5/02 To:         Carolyn Hess Cc:          From:         Rohit Bhasin RE:          state of matter v. Delaney In the case of State v. Delaney in that location are some(prenominal) issues that need to be addressed. The First issue is the credibleness of Val Cavarretta. some other is the cause that detective Lowery had in weft up the so-c al unrivalleded suspect. The only thing he had to go on was the dictation of a drug dealer whose credibleness is still in question. The thiefy occurred on September fourteenth and the carte was non conducted until September 22nd, how genuine could Mr. Waitkus be that Mr. Delaney was the alleged robber? The undermentioned question is why were the people in the lineup so closely related in physical features? homogeneous race, all within two inches in height and ten dollar bill pounds in weight. A nonher issue is how old were the finger prints tha t the patrol had on hand of Mr. Delaney and what condition were they kept in. Have they been tampered with? These questions are non asked or answered anywhere. Another disturbing issue is that Mr. Waitkus when asked to rob a person out of a lineup was not sure whether Mr. Delaney was the robber. In the Police Lineup Form Mr. Waitkus states I speculate #4 is probably the person. This raises the issue of if Mr.

Waitkus is not one hundred percent positive why is Mr. Delaney until now universe held in custody. Mr. Waitkus stated that the lighting in the install was in truth sizable and he got a good fancy at the suspect, but then he similarly said that the suspect was wearing a base ball chapiter that covered fractional of h! is face. How could Mr. Waitkus have gotten a good look if the suspects face was half(prenominal) covered? Another intriguing issue is the situation that Mr. Cavarretta stricken a deal with the prosecution... If you want to get a large essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.